Californians who are on parole after being convicted of a felony would be allowed to vote in future elections under Proposition 17, which was garnering support from voters in early election returns on Tuesday.
Published: 2020-11-03 11:55 pm
Prop. 17, which would allow felony parolees to vote, jumps out to lead in early election returns

Californians convicted of felonies but who are on parole would be allowed to vote in future elections under a ballot measure, Proposition 17, that was garnering support from voters in early election returns on Tuesday.

The measure would restore the vote to some 50,000 parolees by changing the state Constitution, which disqualifies people with felony convictions from voting until their incarceration and parole are completed.

Proposition 17’s supporters include the California Democratic Party; Sen. Kamala Harris, Democratic nominee for vice president; and Assemblyman Kevin McCarty (D-Sacramento), who authored the measure.

“Prop. 17 gives Californians the chance to right a wrong and restore voting rights for a marginalized community and people of color,” McCarty said. “This is good for democracy and good for public safety.”

Opponents include the California Republican Party and state Sen. Jim Nielsen (R-Gerber), who called Proposition 17 an “affront” to victims of crime.

“They deserve to see justice done,” Nielsen said, adding that those convicted of felonies “should serve ... just time for the sentence and that includes the parole period.”

The measure was placed on the ballot by the California Legislature at a time when the Black Lives Matter movement was sparking new discussion of the impact of the criminal justice system on people of color.

Three out of 4 men leaving California prisons are Black, Latino or Asian American, according to the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, a fact the Proposition 17 campaign says is due to persistent and systematic racial inequalities in the criminal justice system.

Under Proposition 17, people convicted of felonies who are still in prison would continue to be disqualified from voting. The state Constitution allows people on probation to vote.

Nineteen states allow voting by people convicted of felonies who are on parole. Maine, Vermont and the District of Columbia allow those convicted of felonies to vote while incarcerated.

California previously extended voting rights to people in county jails.

There is no organized campaign committee opposing Proposition 17, while supporters, including Secretary of State Alex Padilla, have raised more than $1.3 million for their campaign.

“Today, in California there are 50,000 women and men who have completed their state prison sentence, are reintegrating back into society, working jobs and paying taxes, but are denied the right to vote,” Padilla said. “Yet research shows that in jurisdictions where voting rights are more easily restored, formerly incarcerated individuals re-offend at lower rates.”

Among people who have been arrested previously, 27% of nonvoters were rearrested, compared with 12% of voters, according to a 2004 study by Christopher Uggen and Jeff Manza, sociology professors at the University of Minnesota and New York University, respectively.

Read Full Story

The U.S. awarded her fight for human rights. ICE detained her son - 2 months ago
Human rights lawyer Wang Yu made a forced confession in prison so her son could leave China. He arrived in Los Angeles and was held in a desert prison.
Read More

Complex, years-long litigation anticipated in major LAPD protest lawsuit - 8 months ago
Those wondering whether and how the Los Angeles Police Department and the city of L.A. will be held legally liable for missteps in handling the city's mass protests this summer aren't likely to have an answer anytime soon.
Read More

A family's COVID-19 dilemma: Hope he lives or help him die - 5 months ago
Bob Harris told his family he didn't want to be on a ventilator, but when his family wasn't ready for him to stop fighting COVID-19, he agreed to be intubated. One week on the ventilator turned into three, and the Harris family faced a terrible decision.
Read More

Judge rules against Los Angeles in Long Valley irrigation fight - 2 months ago
Ruling has significant implications for water agencies statewide facing the complex challenges of servicing ratepayers and meeting environmental requirements.
Read More